I feel I must make some response to Neil Young’s recent hyperbole which is even further from the truth than feel good propaganda from industry sources
These links are satellite images from space. Most are to the same scale. This is an attempt to put some perspective into the oil sands controversy.
They will open in their own tabs for easy comparison. Please take the time to look.
Fort McMurray oil sands mining projects. Not as extensive as some people would have you believe
City of Edmonton Probably about the same area
Long lake in situ project Yes it is in there, including a upgrader. Zoom in to find it.
City of Ottawa Not sure of the carbon emissions but lot’s of hot air comes out of here.
In situ projects near cold lake Although not as extensive, in situ projects do have an impact on the surface.
Los Angeles area, USA The scale is different on this one. It should actually appear larger
Vancouver area, BC The scale is different on this one as well. It should also appear larger.
Which would have a larger carbon foot print, Edmonton or the oil sands mines?
Some believe that forcing governments and industry to reduce or eliminate oil sands production will have a significant effect on worldwide carbon emissions. I believe it may have the opposite effect by forcing more production in less environmentally conscientious jurisdictions. My belief is that encouraging and perhaps legislating less consumption at the consumer level is the only way to have a significant effect.
The pressures from population growth, and emerging nations, will make actual reductions extremely difficult. A good example from the developed nations, however, can only help.